Now Playing Tracks

girldwarf:

queerpunkhamlet:

recoveringsjw:

sidneyia:

god-senpai:

queerpunkhamlet:

cis people aren’t allowed to edit my papers anymore

"WHAAATT? I HAVE TO EXPLAIN MY WORK??? IN MY OWN PAPER??? WHAT THE FUUUCK??"

It’s not my job to educate you, teacher. 

I’m betting one hundred bucks that this is a comment about a really badly written essay and not someone being actively transphobic.

well, you’re about to owe me one hundred bucks.
this is not the first time i mentioned privilege in the paper. or cisgender. this paper was written on my personal experiences with being trans, and the difficulties i’ve faced because of it, and the difficulties that cisgender people with otherwise comparable lives have not faced.
the terms privilege and cisgender had both been thoroughly elaborated on in this paper.
this paper was written for a women’s studies class, on gender analysis, in which both privilege and cisgender privilege in particular had been explained, elaborated upon, and discussed by the professor.
the comment was not by the professor, it was by a cis classmate during a peer review.
the words cisgender and privilege are both in scare quotes (in case you can’t google that or don’t know what it means or want to deny their existence, scare quotes is when you put a word or phrase in quotation marks to make it seem less real — the textual version of sarcastically making air quotes with your fingers)
another edit, by the same editor, involved asking me what my birth name was. i’m sure you don’t need to be told that that’s transphobic.
i spoke to the professor about this edit, and he agreed with me that the comment (and the way it was phrased) was out of line. in fact, he thought it was so out of line that he led a workshop for the class on how not to be disrespectful assholes to trans people (say, by asking for their birth name, or telling them they’re wrong or oversensitive about transphobia).
i got a 99% on the essay — WITHOUT changing anything the edit asked for.
the professor liked my essay so much that he asked to keep it as an EXAMPLE for future classes
bonus: if your reaction to seeing gross transphobic things is “well it’s probably the trans person’s fault”, then you’re gross and transphobic and i hope you don’t know any trans people IRL for their sake


I think this person had to actively ignore the paper, I mean—they misspelled privilege with it RIGHT THERE. They’re not paying attention. (And I wouldn’t attribute that spelling mistake to something other than plain neglecting the content of the course and the essay, which is the only reason I’d make note of it.) Also, no one should really make excuses for peer review. Peer review is garbage lmao. Like, you can’t say,  “They’re just asking a valid Q!” because 95% peer reviewers are just bad at giving feedback. This person asking that at the END of the paper? I can guarantee that even if the essay was barely sufficient,  they’d understand the basic idea of privilege and cisgender. After years of tutoring English, I promise you this person’s comment isn’t meant to be helpful and isn’t helpful even if it was meant to be. It’s a great example of taking personal biases and using them against a paper rather than addressing the paper for what it is. Like,  never read an anti-abortion paper and say, “You mean you don’t think we deserve a choice!??!?!” because it’s useless.
Zoom Info
Camera
iPhone 5
ISO
50
Aperture
f/2.4
Exposure
1/2358th
Focal Length
4mm

girldwarf:

queerpunkhamlet:

recoveringsjw:

sidneyia:

god-senpai:

queerpunkhamlet:

cis people aren’t allowed to edit my papers anymore

"WHAAATT? I HAVE TO EXPLAIN MY WORK??? IN MY OWN PAPER??? WHAT THE FUUUCK??"

It’s not my job to educate you, teacher.

I’m betting one hundred bucks that this is a comment about a really badly written essay and not someone being actively transphobic.

well, you’re about to owe me one hundred bucks.

  1. this is not the first time i mentioned privilege in the paper. or cisgender. this paper was written on my personal experiences with being trans, and the difficulties i’ve faced because of it, and the difficulties that cisgender people with otherwise comparable lives have not faced.
  2. the terms privilege and cisgender had both been thoroughly elaborated on in this paper.
  3. this paper was written for a women’s studies class, on gender analysis, in which both privilege and cisgender privilege in particular had been explained, elaborated upon, and discussed by the professor.
  4. the comment was not by the professor, it was by a cis classmate during a peer review.
  5. the words cisgender and privilege are both in scare quotes (in case you can’t google that or don’t know what it means or want to deny their existence, scare quotes is when you put a word or phrase in quotation marks to make it seem less real — the textual version of sarcastically making air quotes with your fingers)
  6. another edit, by the same editor, involved asking me what my birth name was. i’m sure you don’t need to be told that that’s transphobic.
  7. i spoke to the professor about this edit, and he agreed with me that the comment (and the way it was phrased) was out of line. in fact, he thought it was so out of line that he led a workshop for the class on how not to be disrespectful assholes to trans people (say, by asking for their birth name, or telling them they’re wrong or oversensitive about transphobia).
  8. i got a 99% on the essay — WITHOUT changing anything the edit asked for.
  9. the professor liked my essay so much that he asked to keep it as an EXAMPLE for future classes

bonus: if your reaction to seeing gross transphobic things is “well it’s probably the trans person’s fault”, then you’re gross and transphobic and i hope you don’t know any trans people IRL for their sake

I think this person had to actively ignore the paper, I mean—they misspelled privilege with it RIGHT THERE. They’re not paying attention. (And I wouldn’t attribute that spelling mistake to something other than plain neglecting the content of the course and the essay, which is the only reason I’d make note of it.)

Also, no one should really make excuses for peer review. Peer review is garbage lmao. Like, you can’t say, “They’re just asking a valid Q!” because 95% peer reviewers are just bad at giving feedback. This person asking that at the END of the paper? I can guarantee that even if the essay was barely sufficient, they’d understand the basic idea of privilege and cisgender.

After years of tutoring English, I promise you this person’s comment isn’t meant to be helpful and isn’t helpful even if it was meant to be. It’s a great example of taking personal biases and using them against a paper rather than addressing the paper for what it is. Like, never read an anti-abortion paper and say, “You mean you don’t think we deserve a choice!??!?!” because it’s useless.

moonflowerchilde:

parkingstrange:

xoheart-on-her-sleeve:

sassy-satan666:

unmutekurloz:

raspberryskittles:

dion-thesocialist:

isn’t there a part of the bible where god gets mad at a fig tree for not having any figs on it and curses the fig tree?

yeah there legit is that’s 100% true

Yes.

Oh my god

last time we reblogged this we got anon hate from the christian community. You guys really are passionate about your figs.

IM CRYING WHAT

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union